Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19240 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 16:02:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 16:02:30 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 22470 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 16:02:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 16:02:42 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16ACRe-00086q-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 15:52:50 +0000 Received: from europa.your-site.com ([140.186.45.14]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16ACRc-00086l-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 15:52:49 +0000 Received: from att.net ([166.82.180.100]) by europa.your-site.com ; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 10:52:03 -0500 Message-ID: <3C08FCAD.7B77B310@att.net> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 10:52:13 -0500 From: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" Organization: JDM Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: ZL6QH 137.79 KHz as seen in North Carolina References: <3C08DC6F.83A7BBB4@att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I have uploaded two more screen shots from last night if anyone would like to analyze the times of reception. http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/ZL6QHb1Dec01.jpg http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/ZL6QHc1Dec01.jpg If I counted correctly the best signal was around 0930 UTC (Argo time is UTC -5). Dexter McIntyre W4DEX wrote: > > http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/ZL6QHa1Dec01.jpg > > Looks like .4 Hz DFCW to me. Time on Argo is EST (-5 UTC). I > calibrated for 0 Hz on Argo scale to represent 137.790 kHz when I set up > about 0400 UTC. I just checked calibration at 1300 UTC and found the > calibration to be off by .09 Hz. Looks like the captured DFCW signal > shows close to .1 Hz high. > > Dexter, W4DEX > > electrolux