Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3661 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 01:40:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 01:40:09 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 25553 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 01:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 01:40:07 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 169z4s-0006fA-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 01:36:26 +0000 Received: from europa.your-site.com ([140.186.45.14]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 169z4r-0006f5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 01:36:25 +0000 Received: from att.net ([166.82.180.100]) by europa.your-site.com ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:35:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3C0833FB.AD0586B3@att.net> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:35:55 -0500 From: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" Organization: JDM Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: 75 kHz HBG +50db above noise in NC References: <3C0813D6.28D093B3@att.net> <002501c179fb$f8965b00$0400000a@parissn2> <001d01c17a00$82cf58e0$0300a8c0@charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: John, The 75 Hz RTTY centered on 73.6 kHz is not a continuous transmission. I have heard it every day this week around 2200 UT. It produces a reading of -30 dbm on my selective level meter (tuned loop with preamp) when the normal noise level reads -75 dbm. My assumption that the signal originates from CFH came from this page: http://www.provcomm.net/pages/joe/introvlf.htm#Target If you do not hear it strong we need to find another possible source. Stewart, I have a .wav file of the 73.6 kHz signal. It's one minuet long and is close to 1 mb. Will send it to you if you would like to analyze it. Dexter John Andrews wrote: > > Stewart, > > > Also, is the following about the FSK signals correct? > > On about 73.6 kHz is CFH (75 Hz shift and 75 BPS) > > and on about 73.3 kHz is Rugby (100 Hz shift and 100 BPS). > > I have only seen listings in The Lowdown for CFH being on 73.6. They > certainly haven't been there in the last week, as the signal would be > overpowering here in Massachusetts. > > The center frequency for Rugby is 73.25 as seen here, and the signal is > exactly 100 Hz wide. It is a few dB stronger here tonight than it was at > this UTC time on Tuesday. > > John Andrews, W1TAG