Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13996 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 15:47:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 15:47:07 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 2044 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 15:46:57 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 15:46:57 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16DSZQ-0000qO-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:42:20 +0000 Received: from imo-d07.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.39]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16DSZK-0000qG-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:42:18 +0000 Received: from DL4YHF@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id l.18d.35772a (4230) for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:40:52 -0500 (EST) From: DL4YHF@aol.com Message-ID: <18d.35772a.29463183@aol.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:40:51 EST Subject: Re: LF: Re: ARGO capture question To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows DE sub 10504 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hi Alberto,

I had the same problem some time ago and found it quite annoying to fool around with the 256-color mode and the color palette routines (however i still support that mode for that old 75-MHz-reptile used at DF0WD). A modern CPU moves 32-bit values as fast as 8-bit values, so why support this old mode anyway.
I would leave the routines as they are, not waste too much time for it. You might display a message box to inform the user that he is still using 256-color modes. Just a thought...

73  Wolf  DL4YHF.