Return-Path: Received: (qmail 366 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2001 19:39:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Dec 2001 19:39:21 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 20655 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2001 19:39:24 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Dec 2001 19:39:24 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16JJrf-0002UJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 19:37:23 +0000 Received: from imo-m09.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.164]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16JJre-0002UE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 19:37:22 +0000 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-m09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id l.15.201b1816 (3968) for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 14:36:31 -0500 (EST) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <15.201b1816.295b80bf@aol.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 14:36:31 EST Subject: Re: LF: Possible modulation scheme? To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: This being a topic likely to hold very little interest for our EU and NZ friends because it is so intimately tied to US regulations, I'll spare the bandwidth here myself, and respond later today on the lowfer@qth reflector. There are at least two really significant objections, one regulatory and one technical. 73, John