Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14432 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2001 12:18:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Nov 2001 12:18:36 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 8514 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2001 12:18:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Nov 2001 12:18:35 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 162tSG-0005P1-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 12:11:16 +0000 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129] helo=e31.bld.us.ibm.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 162tSF-0005Ow-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 12:11:15 +0000 Received: from westrelay01.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.22]) by e31.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA23722 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 07:07:52 -0500 Received: from usa.net (ss6.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.71]) by westrelay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.00) with ESMTP id fABCAR140628 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 05:10:27 -0700 Message-ID: <3BEE6A88.739A88F9@usa.net> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 13:09:44 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Transatlantic Tests References: <5.1.0.14.0.20011109175651.00a64738@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <001001c16a42$121f1fe0$9490153e@w8k3f0> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dick Rollema wrote: > Dear Old Man, > > Received Jim M0MBU November 10 at 2330 UTC with a field strength of 13.5 > microvolt/metre. > I also have received a signal, which could have been that of Jim, but I was using an untuned string of wire (not even 'wet'...), so cannot be sure. But I noticed that the QRG was 135.925 and not 135.922 as announced. Is my receiver off by as much as three Hertz (I hope not...), was Jim transmitting as a matter of facts at 135.925, or wasn't that the signal of Jim ? 73 Alberto I2PHD