Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28644 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 23:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 23:08:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 12960 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 23:08:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 23:08:29 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 168rIh-0005JJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:06:03 +0000 Received: from tvout.mail.uk.easynet.net ([194.6.96.5]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 168rIf-0005J8-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:06:01 +0000 Received: from ericadodd (tnt-18-138.easynet.co.uk [212.134.224.138]) by tvout.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A99A634BC for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:05:12 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <002001c17798$650befe0$8ae086d4@ericadodd> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20011121102933.00a7b730@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <001401c176b3$3c5f8100$b6a1153e@w8k3f0> Subject: Re: LF: Measuring Q Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:49:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Dick, > I used this method and two other ones to measure the Q of my loading coil. > The coil can be seen on page 62 and on the cover of the LF Handbook (the > caption of Fig. 4.17 at page 62 describes the coil on the cover). > > With a 47nF 2% capacitor in parallel the coil resonates at 11.56kHz. From > this follows an inductance of 4033 microhenry (the large value of the > capacitor eliminates the influence of the unknown self-capacitance of the > coil). At 137kHz the inductive reactance of the coil is 3470 ohms. > > Using Jim's method I found a resistance of 9.17 ohms for the coil. This > yields a Q of 3470/9.11 = 378. > > I also measured the resistance at 137kHz of the series resonant circuit, > consisting of coil and vacuum capacitor, using an admittance bridge. I > found the resistance to be 9.11 ohms. From this follows a Q of 381. > > I finally made a parallel resonant circuit at 137kHz, again using the vacuum > capacitor. The bandwidth between the -3dB frequencies was 340Hz. This yields > a Q of 137000/340 = 403. To avoid damping of the circuit by the tracking > generator and selective voltmeter I excited the coil with a single turn > loop, located 36cm below the bottom end of the coil. I connected a 1:10 > oscilloscope probe to the voltmeter and clipped it on the insulation of the > top end of the coil. Your three Q measurements indicate that your measurement techniques are sound - unlike mine! It occurs to me that I could use my HP vector impedance meter to measure Q using the series resonant method. Unfortunately it only goes down to 500kHz so cannot measure Q at the operating frequency. If I did the measurement at a higher frequency would the reactance of the series resonating capacitor be significant and give a higher value of perceived resistance? I could also use my 3M bridge (page 86 of LF book), which can measure R at the operating frequency (136kHz and 73kHz). The resonance curve could then be plotted using the S/W shown on Fig 6.12. More experimenting to be done when the weather gets dryer. Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web