Message-ID: <000a01c172a6$7d1ee980$e8ae883e@g3aqc>
From: "Laurie Mayhead" <laurie@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <120.77186d9.292d1771@aol.com> <002c01c172a1$c6c6c120$09dc9384@ma.ultranet.com>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:05:58 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Thanks John, I will go for the complete call now (dont want any criticism !)
Would it not be better to use 90 or even 120sec Argo at your end to ensure
maximum SNR.Alternately I could shorten my dots, that way we could get more
through in a given time .Best to have the same conditions at both ends  73s
Laurie.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Andrews" <w1tag@charter.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon


> David,
>
> >Errr, don't you need a complete call for a 'world record'  ?
> >However, that must be just a matter of a few more nights.
>
> Not a bad point. Conditions were such that a full call sign should have
been
> possible. Perhaps Laurie should give that a try. I was running half-hour
> screen captures with ARGO set for 60 sec. dots, and that gave some overlap
> between screens to keep from splitting the IDs.
>
> John Andrews, W1TAG
>
>
>