Message-ID: <3BD059AC.A460BD5E@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:49:49 +0100
From: "gii3kev" <gii3kev@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Organization: Netscape Online member
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Tx stability
References: <200110170241_MC3-E390-116D@compuserve.com> <003501c1576c$29fe4a20$72597ad5@j1r9b7> <3BCF08F9.43B4E5C8@netscapeonline.co.uk> <3BD05787.A3AD328B@virgin.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


Stewart Bryant wrote:

> >
> > It is great to live north of Watford where we have freedom of speech and
> > expression and plenty of real estate for real LF antenna experimentation and an
> > abundance of MERCEDES BENZ to drive on roads still uncongested.
> > G3KEV
>
> ... and where your transmitter can wander all over the band when you
> make your first transmission of the day.

Sri to disappoint you but its impossible for my tx to wander, driven by the FT1000 as
a driving source. I also monitor the outgoing signal on a spectrum analyzer. I seldom
need to adjust the tuning but when I do it is carried out using a tracking osc with
micro/watts.
I have heard swishing and dots lately, expect its someone tuning/adjusting but there
was no call sent,
it was especially noticeable over the week end.
Get your fact right before pointing the FINGER om. Try your next victim.
G3KEV


>
>
> Stewart