Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19573 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2001 11:39:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Oct 2001 11:39:20 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 11456 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2001 11:38:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 14 Oct 2001 11:38:04 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15sjSw-0000xA-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 12:29:58 +0100 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.201.52.152]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15sjSv-0000x5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 12:29:57 +0100 Received: from ldsas07-71-122-153.cw-visp.com ([212.137.122.153] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 15sjJI-0004UE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 11:20:01 +0000 Message-ID: <3BC96906.CB23D0A9@netscapeonline.co.uk> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 11:29:26 +0100 From: "gii3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: ZL6QH & access to 136 References: <6759669.1002876291241.JavaMail.computernetworks@gomailjtp05> <00ca01c153b0$a30444c0$2fb51bca@xtr743187> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Vernall wrote: > John G4CNN, > > In response to points: > > > Presumably the 5 watts you mention is the upper limit permitted? > > Yes, a ZL LF permit allows up to 5 watts radiated power. > > > Please keep us in the picture re schedules, so that we can be > listening/watching at the right time. > > Some homework is needed on sunset and sunrise times, as near-antipodean > paths do not have much mutual darkness for each end of a path. In practice > ZL6QH would transmit for all hours of local darkness, and selection of > reception time(s) can be estimated at "your end". > > Dates already identified for LF DX testing from ZL and VK are 1 and 15 > December (Saturday night ZL time, which is +13 hours on UTC). These dates > were not selected on the basis of good sunrise and sunset times with respect > to Europe, but they could be times for a 136 kHz squirt from ZL6QH. > > 73, Bob Hello Bob. I have worked ZL many times on 160 metres so maybe I am in with a chance on 136 khz. I have suitable LF antennas for the job if it is at all possibe to make the distance. Best times on 160 are sunset/sunrise times this might also be the optimum for 136 khz but it does not always follow on LF. Signals on 136 khz around EU are just as good day time as well as night, at longer distances we will have to find out. I frequently work OH1TN daytime at 589 each way over 1600 km away, his signal is just as good day time as night, in fact there is more noise during the dark hours. 73 and gl de Mal/G3KEV/Scarborough