Message-ID: <3BC18CE0.51835705@usa.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:24:16 +0200
From: "Alberto di Bene" <dibene@usa.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: New Spectran V 1
References: <14d.213bcd6.28f00555@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

DL4YHF@aol.com wrote:

> Hello Alberto, Vittorio,   and group,
>
> Curious as I am, I immediately installed the brand new Spectran V1 b106 this morning and was
> amazed of the performance and stability of it. Whatever I tried, I didn't get it to crash...  ;-)
> The scrolling is indeed very smooth, the automated detection of the signal paths inside the
> soundcard worked right from the beginning, and the DSP denoiser makes listening on HF a pleasure
> (I didn't use it on LF yet).
>
> Good job !

Hello Wolf,
   thanks for the report, expecially as it is coming from, ehm.., the 'competition'.. :-)
But, seriously, the target audiences of Spectran and your excellent SpecLab are a bit
different. Spectran is geared towards the end user, while yours is more oriented to
people that know how to specify, let's say, the coefficients of an IIR or FIR filter.
So perhaps there is no a real competition, having the two programs different goals.

Very glad you haven't been able (so far) to crash it, but I would be even more glad
if you could... that would mean that you have found one of the undoubtely many bugs
that are lurking inside the program, just waiting to be awakened...

TNX es 73  Alberto  I2PHD