Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16353 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 09:27:16 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 09:27:16 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 27613 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 09:27:02 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 09:27:02 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15yrY7-00045A-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:20:39 +0000 Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15yrY6-000455-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:20:38 +0000 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id KAA90572 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 10:19:57 +0100 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20011031101758.2d2f5314@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 10:17:58 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: QRSS Transmissions In-reply-to: <1635154.1004467399160.JavaMail.computernetworks@gomailjtp0 5> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >Dick gave me an OOO report Hello group, it seems to me that there is still some misunderstanding about the report system for QRSS : it is just either O, M or T where O = 100% copy M = less than 100% copy but sufficient for a QSO T = signal copied but unsufficient for a QSO It doen't matter wether someone sents O or OO or OOO etc... the report is just O and is repeated a few time to ensure that it is copied correct. If you already got an O report from your QSO partner it is sufficient to send his report once or twice (so O or OO), sending it 3 times is just a waste of time unless you have indications that conditions may change rapidly. 73, Rik ON7YD