Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11140 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 12:28:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 12:28:29 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 25087 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 12:27:15 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 12:27:15 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15t6gy-0004Ht-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:18:00 +0100 Received: from siaag2ac.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.133]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15t6gw-0004Ho-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:17:59 +0100 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by siaag2ac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.12) id IAA22487 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:17:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:16:59 -0400 From: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" Subject: LF: Farewell, LFers -- that's why I like it! To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200110150817_MC3-E33B-EA76@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello LF-Group, first of all: I am really sorry to see Steve, GW4ALG, going off board. Steve, I really enjoyed the efforts and struggle we had, and your patience, when we had our first QSO about 2 years ago, which took us, as far as I can remember, well over an hour, just to get our reports passed through. This was for a long time my ODX. We both have improved our stations as well as probably also our communication skills in regards to copy weak signals, so that in the meantime a reliable CW QSO between us is not a real problem anymore. In the past mails in regards to this subject I have seen the entire bandwidth of opinions, that show the inhomogenity so well, and that make the "work" within this group so enjoyable. We have "purists" for whom a "valid" QSO is exactly defined, even if it consists only of the exchange of a report. Other people do only accept QSOs when they are made by people using their own CW skills and do not rely on computer help. Or the people who say, that real radios "glow in the dark", as back in the 20ties or 30ties of last century. We have the technical experts, whom we can ask for explanations for almost each and every detail of our LF hobby (by the way: I have not got a good explanation for my question in regards to my bridge problem ...). We have a group of people who simply enjoy chatting in Morse-code, they meet each weekend and have endless discussions about subjects, that would by far easier be handled by e-mail or the telephone. But they enjoy that kind of chat. We have the ambitious kind of people, who need new records and challenges to be laying ahead of them to get their fulfillment. Europe-America: solved. What's next? America-Pacific? Around the world? We have the propagation enthusiasts, even those without any transmitting equipment, who find their fulfillment simply in observing the Earth's ionosphere reaction to events that happen 150 Million km away. Others have never transmitted or received a single signal on LF, but contributed to our enjoyment a lot by sitting in their shacks in front of their computer screens writing software that help us to detect signals, that other experts don't believe they can ever be detected. The experimenters want to develop new schematics, build them, find out: yes, it works, before they start a new project. And other experimenter's ask the question: can a liner repeater be build that transfers the LF band to another frequency? Then there is the vast majority of all of us who simply enjoy our hobby by a combination of all those (and numerous unmentioned) experimenter's traits and activities. One evening we sit there and build a new device, eager to test it during the next weekend. Then we hear something about someone receiving U.K. on the continent on 73 kHz, and we jump on that train, to enjoy a few crossband QSOs the next day. Besides, we have a few QSOs with those, who like to chat, and give a few advises to those, who start. But we all have in common, that we make use of a modern, non-amateur media to exchange our ideas, discuss our different opinions, and help each other. This is what I have enjoyed in LF operation since my first telephone chat with late Peter, DJ8WL, almost 4 or 5 years ago, in which he mentioned something about a possible operation on frequencies around 130 or 140 kHz, at that time a complete unknown area of the radio spectrum to me. I have tried many facets in ham radio since I was first licensed in 1973 (HF, QRP, DX-peditions, satellite QSOs, ATV, RTTY, etc.) but I have never before in ham radio found such a group as the worldwide LF community ready to help with all their expertise and friendliness. That's what I enjoy! Best 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)