Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24856 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 11:50:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 11:50:16 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 28847 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 11:47:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 11:47:46 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15wivz-0002VW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:44:27 +0100 Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.81] helo=mailout03.sul.t-online.de) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15wivx-0002VO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:44:26 +0100 Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15wivA-00021R-0A; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:43:36 +0200 Received: from (0482183881-0001@[62.156.6.190]) by fwd02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 15wiv2-0QcAUaC; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:43:28 +0200 From: "jannsen" <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <151.2bf4d22.290284a6@aol.com> Subject: Re: LF: dcf39 X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:43:28 +0200 Message-ID: <15wiv2-0QcAUaC@fwd02.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 0482183881-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: DL4YHF@aol.com schrieb: > Hello Uwe and group, > > About the "mysterious"(?) carrier observed on DCF/DBF (I think DBF is their > spare transmitter): > As Uwe wrote: > > >sri, Markus, but the screenshot does`nt convince me. > >sri, Wolfgang, I do not belief in "Kohärenzprobleme". > > > In a direct mail to Uwe I called it "non-coherent signal", but it meant > exactly the same as Markus (DF6NM) explained here on the reflector a few > hours later. I don't think there is any mysterious very-narrow-bandwidth > coding. > > DCF39 is intended to be received by simple receivers; and the transmitter > simply does not care for a coherent carrier just because a few radio amateurs > would like to use it as a high-precision reference (hi). > > > The reason for the incoherent carrier signal maybe this (with my basic > knowledge ): > Switching from the "space" frequency to the "mark" frequency in the TX is > done when the carrier signal Y(t) crosses zero. After an integer number of > full sine wave periods (when Y(t) is zero again), the frequency is switched > back again. This will not necessarily be the old phase of the "space" > frequency before a data bit. So, as an effect, there is no coherent phase - > as explained before. > > You could verify this with an audio phase meter. I did this some time ago and > could see the phase meter jump around after every pulse train, but could not > find a rule. Maybe the amount of phase shift is simply a result of the count > of "ones" in the databits. > > > > I will see my friends at the Radio-Monitoring-Station Itzehoe > > (RegTP-Aussenstelle) to solve the problem (I make it my problem) > > by analysing the frequenzy using their equipment (I have been > > member of the staff). > > Please let me know the results. > > Good luck, > Wolf DL4YHF > > (now off to look for Dave G(M)3YXM in simple CW without coherence problems. > No kite-friendly WX here at the moment, nothing but blue sky and sun) Hi Markus, Wolf, Ko es All. meantime I have been with my friends at the Radio-Monitoring-Station. usually we measure the qrg of an A-null by comparing it with a qrg-normal (caesium standard) using the lissajou figur. but the figur did not come to a standstill measuring the mark of DCF39. my friends did analyse the mark: it is constantly 10Hz A2-modulated (sinus) and constantly 45dgr Phase-modulated. no parts of FM. I emphasize "constant", i.e. not in the least influenced by the FSK-bursts. during the 20 min of analysing no keying observed. my friends did analyse on front IF level (no filter) of the receiving equipment (Rhode & Schwarz). it is impossible analysing it on audio level. the results wld be incorrect. there we are. regards Uwe/dj8wx