Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10845 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 21:38:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 21:38:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 4736 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2001 21:37:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 18 Oct 2001 21:37:59 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15uKnf-0007FU-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:33:59 +0100 Received: from tor-smtp4.attcanada.ca ([207.181.101.72] helo=attcanada.ca) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15uKnd-0007FO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:33:57 +0100 Received: from david (ham-on52-045.netcom.ca [142.154.65.45]) by attcanada.ca (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA24420 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:32:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <00e401c15813$f82239a0$de419a8e@david> From: "Tenty" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <200110170241_MC3-E390-116D@compuserve.com> <003501c1576c$29fe4a20$72597ad5@j1r9b7> <3BCF08F9.43B4E5C8@netscapeonline.co.uk> Subject: Re: LF: Re: MB7LF Remote receiver relay Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:32:00 +0100 Organization: Holland Data and Wireless MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: "I am speaking on behalf of the majority" Is often abused by a minority to pursue their own agenda who thinks their idea of experimentation is the only one mandated by the almighty himself! And what about the freedom to experiment? Awards, qsl cards are a personal thing and if you cheat you cheat yourself.. Don't deny somebody elses experiment because one of these days he/she may deny yours! 73, Bob ve3tok ----- Original Message ----- From: "gii3kev" Actually 3 according to this message disagree. Currently if you count the number of LF operators ACTIVE on 136 khz and 73 khz from the UK this represents nearly 50 percent that disagree with vhf/uhf linking. Seeing the other mans point of view I can see what you are doing but who can tell if someone in the South of England within ear shot of the vhf link works DX actually heard the dx direct on LF or via the vhf RX REMOTE LINK. This could encourage cheating for award claims. I can also assure you that a good number of other radio amateurs active on LF and interested are against what you are doing, but they do not wish to get involved with the politics of LF. It is great to live north of Watford where we have freedom of speech and expression and plenty of real estate for real LF antenna experimentation and an abundance of MERCEDES BENZ to drive on roads still uncongested. G3KEV