Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22258 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2001 01:54:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Oct 2001 01:54:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 25157 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2001 01:54:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 17 Oct 2001 01:54:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15tfrW-0001iA-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 02:51:14 +0100 Received: from tomts6.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.26] helo=tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15tfrV-0001i5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 02:51:13 +0100 Received: from server1 ([209.226.189.71]) by tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with SMTP id <20011017015000.YJLV4990.tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@server1> for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:50:00 -0400 Message-ID: <002f01c156ae$053a2740$0a00a8c0@ThreeLakes.ca> From: "Larry Kayser" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <132.321ded3.28fe039c@aol.com> Subject: LF: Re: DBF39 Frequency Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:47:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Markus: > Larry brought up an interesting point: > > > Just a short note, I am receiving DCF39 most every day, ... > > My bucket size is less than 1.22 milliHz and I can see the day/night > > frequency change on DCF39 as well, variation is very small but it is visible > > most days. > > Could that be ionospheric doppler shift? How large is the effect? I have been working on trying to allocate the effect I see to software issues and real QSY issues. I am not yet successful and with the tools I have I may not be able to see the effect well enough to allocate amounts to each. My sense of it is that part of it is real as it occurs over a period of hours. The amount is rarely more than 2 milliHz. I have just finished a special large insulated box in which I will put the IC-706 MKII G this coming winter, my goal is to try and remove some of the QSY from the equipment but I need better tools I suspect to make real measurements. I am trying to get some sort of program running here, but since I am not seeing anyone show up for TransAtlantic QSO attempts using QRS I will probably go back to working on DCF39 again. Larry VA3LK