Message-ID: <001701c15c96$bb3d6fa0$bc6601d5@default>
From: "Alan Melia" <Alan.Melia@btinternet.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: Re: CFH?
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:05:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Thanks John that was just the right frequency. The overnight plot here was
very odd. Either they are not running full power or the T/A path is totally
crushed by the geomagnetic storms recently.  It did not reach anywhere near
the normal CFH levels in the UK between midnight and dawn. Thanks for the
gen.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK
alan.melia@btinternet.com

-----Original Message-----
From: John Andrews <w1tag@charter.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: 24 October 2001 13:35
Subject: LF: Re: CFH?


>Dave,
>
>> This morning I heard an unmodulated carrier around 137.0 which may mean
>the return of
>> CFH.  I didn't listen until around 0630z however, by which time it was
>well down the
>> dawn fade.  Can Larry or the other VEs confirm its return, or am I
hearing
>something
>> else?
>
>I can confirm that there is a very loud carrier in Massachusetts this
>morning on 137.042 kHz. Don't know if it's CFH, or not.
>
>John Andrews, W1TAG
>
>