Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23315 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2001 14:15:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Oct 2001 14:15:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 8656 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2001 14:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 14 Oct 2001 14:14:59 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15slyY-0001HK-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:10:46 +0100 Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.93] helo=rhenium) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15slyX-0001HF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:10:45 +0100 Received: from [62.7.64.96] (helo=default) by rhenium with smtp (Exim 3.22 #6) id 15slxs-0000xW-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: <000701c154b9$46e85a00$6040073e@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: MB2HFC and weekend report Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 14:19:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Wolf, I dont know why the guys at Windsor did not copy, you were a clear signal here (JO02PB) on the computer speakers in 2.1kHz bandwidth, even with other activity on the band. I would guess a 549, but I am at least 150kms closer to you than the HFC Station. It could be conditions I suppose even over that distance.....but that was covered in my talk. Thanks are due to you for the software that produced the data at CT1DRP, which I mainly used for illustrating my talk. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com -----Original Message----- From: DL4YHF@aol.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: 14 October 2001 13:15 Subject: LF: MB2HFC and weekend report >Hello group, >I hard MB2HFC on saturday and sunday with good signal, but got no reply. >I guess the 136kHz->144MHz transponder has the same problem as some AmSat's, >suffering from very strong "inband" signals as they were present this weekend. >Anyway, was nice to listen to a lot of QSOs going on. Heard but not worked: >OH1TN (549), EI0CF(439 in local QRM), MB2HFC(559), G3YXM(589). > >Worked for the first time: DK3GH in southern DL, loc JN59, 449 in local QRM >(would otherwise have been perfect copy). Thanks Ralph if you are on this >reflector. > >Also thanks to the Crawley guys and all at the LF(!) meeting to trigger some >activities on the band. I will try again later today, but the QRN is already >on its way. It is unusually warm for the season here, 22 deg C and very >humid. Thunderstorms on the way, static crashes on 137 kHz already audible at >11:00 UTC. > >Best wishes, have a nice Sunday. > Wolf DL4YHF (operating from DF0WD in JO42FD, max 100mW ERP). >