Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25967 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 15:14:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 15:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 9506 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 15:14:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 15:14:43 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15YUCV-0004KV-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:09:19 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.91]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15YUCU-0004KQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:09:18 +0100 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15YUBn-000MNv-0X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:08:35 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3B7FD7FB.E4F3F8D6@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:15:07 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "LF Group" Subject: LF: The ANC-4 Noise Canceller at 136 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi All, I have not been on 136 kHz a great deal this weekend because I've been busy testing a noise canceller for possible use by Bob G8RW. (NTL still refuses to investigate the SMPS noise believed to be coming from their cable TV set-top box installed in a house next door to Bob.) Last week, Bob sent me his commercially-built model 'ANC-4' noise canceller so that I could try modifying it for use on 136 kHz. (Bob had bought the unit many years ago for HF use.) As things turned out, I found that it appears to be capable of reasonable performance on 136 kHz without modification. So, now that we know that it has potential on LF, I will be returning the unit to Bob to see how he gets on with it at his QTH. Fingers crossed. Details of my experience with the ANC-4 can be found at: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/anc4test.htm BTW: I think that Ali did a great job of stimulating activity on 136 this past weekend. And the long duration between some QSOs did not discourage Ali putting out numerous CQ calls. I did not have much time to listen this weekend, but DF2BC always seemed to be there! Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG