Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3952 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 09:58:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 09:58:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 4759 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 09:58:30 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 09:58:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Tgzg-0002ct-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2001 10:48:16 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15TgzS-0002cm-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2001 10:48:02 +0100 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id LAA650466 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:47:21 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20010806104654.2dc72e1e@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 10:46:54 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: SV: Re: SV: LF Receivers In-reply-to: <001801c11a5f$ed6ddce0$9a2597d4@oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Christer, what about a ceramic resonator for 3.58MHz ? I used that for a stable 80m VXO some years ago (could pull it 80kHz !). Stability is a bit less than a xtal, but still many times better than a free running VFO. 73, Rik ON7YD At 10:59 1/08/01 +0300, you wrote: >John, > >>3579.545 kHz color burst crystal > >You are right! Thanks for the tip. > >I don't know if it is "easily pullable" though... I remember trying a "32 pF >parallel 3579 rock" in series resonant mode but I did not get lower than >about 3579.3 kHz. The oscillator was a two transistor thing with the xtal >connected between the emitters (xtal sees low Z = preserve the Q). > >Perhaps it will work with some additional inductance in series with the >xtal but the Q will suffer I guess... > >Maybe a *very* low quality xtal will do the trick (lower equivalent L/C = lower Q)? > >Do you have any circuit suggestion for a suitable "rock bender"? > >73 >Johan SM6LKM > > > > >