Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14116 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2001 10:06:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Jul 2001 10:06:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 264 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2001 10:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 6 Jul 2001 10:05:45 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15ISOC-0008HK-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:59:08 +0100 Received: from [204.202.140.198] (helo=webmailmta.go.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15ISOB-0008HF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:59:07 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from gomailjtp01 ([10.212.0.161]) by mta06.seamail.go.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.10.12.16.25.p8) with ESMTP id <0GG100L91QC7V8@mta06.seamail.go.com> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 02:57:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "John Sexton" Subject: Re: LF: The Other Man To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <8351736.994413465552.JavaMail.computernetworks@gomailjtp01> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoMail 3.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Steve, Hi Vic, I looked through my list of stations and found that I have heard Vic at least once, so you are at least getting as far as Reading. Unfortunately I don't have a record of the date nor signal strength, but will listen out again and report when I hear something. Your situation sounds very similar to mine, with big trees that tend to absorb everything. My first receiver was also a Super Regen, which worked very well, but bears no comparison with the AOR 7030 that I subsequently purchased. The main problems were accuracy, bandwidth and knowing exactly where you were listening. I still use it occasionally with a second antenna for dual frequency monitoring, so don't scrap it. Good luck with Dx and I shall be listening out for the call sign. 73, John, G4CNN -----Original Message----- From: "Steve Rawlings" To: "LF Group" Date: Thu Jul 05 10:26:50 PDT 2001 Subject: LF: The Other Man's Station: G8IK >Hi All,> >Vic G8IK, located in Solihull, Birmingham, has been kind enough >to write a personal account describing his first 2 years on LF. >Vic writes: > >Initial 73 kHz tests >-------------------- >Seeking fresh fields, and pastures new, I thought I'd have a go >at 73 - not very optimistic but I thought maybe someone else in >this region might be similarly motivated. Luckily I had just >purchased some coils at a rally and had sufficient for a simple >receiver. I used FETs in three RF stages followed by a voltage >doubling detector with regeneration to improve selectivity, then >the usual audio stages. The coils were single windings with no >coupling coils, so I used resistance capacity coupling between >stages with very small coupling capacities to minimise damping of >the tuned circuits. I have a number of accurate oscillators >which, with Rugby, helped me to find the band. The receiver >worked well, with plenty of gain and selectivity. > >For the rig, I used a small ferrite rod antenna, with a BC108 as >oscillator tuned to the band with two 2000 pF compression >trimmers, which drove two TIP126s in parallel. Using an 80 ohm >power meter as load, these delivered 30 watts or more at 350 mA >80 v. In spite of a reasonable heatsink they overheated after a >few minutes, so I made a multi-vibrator with an on-off ratio of >1:1, driving an on-off relay which enabled the rig to run for >long periods. I wound a 2.5 litre drum full of 22 SWG wire (with >taps) and, with the present antenna extended to about 170 ft >(twice its present length), this resonated somewhere near the >band. I had a variometer (a museum piece) which proved excellent >for fine tuning. With everything in order, I switched the gear >on and made my way, with the receiver, to a colleague who has a >substantial antenna and who lives about a mile away, hoping that >the signal would travel at least this distance, but no - not a >trace! > >Success on 136 kHz >------------------ >136, I thought, offered more promise as the antenna would be >effectively twice as high and twice as long. I retuned the gear >to the new band and, to my delight, had a reply to my first CQ >call: only seven miles away (G3YXM) but it was a start, and, to >my amazement, this was followed by reports from G4GVC and GW4ALG. > >Thus encouraged, I decided to build a 200 watt rig - I had the >main ingredients: two high voltage transformers, a 50 watt >tetrode and two high voltage variable capacitors (45 pF >Eddystone, ca 1935). I assembled all this on a 3 ft x 1 ft >board with a hardboard panel of similar size, using the existing >rig (down-powered) as the driver. My main problem was getting >the right L/C ratio for the anode coil and, at the same time, >allowing for the two variable capacitors (in parallel) to give >some degree of tuning. I partly solved this by tapping the anode >half-way down the coil (a 2.5 litre drum two thirds full of 22 >SWG) and using rather less than the optimum tuning capacity (700 >pF instead of 800-1000 pF). I wound a coupling coil at the cold >end of the coil, and was ready to go. I'd arranged the power >supplies to give me 500, 1000, or with the two in series, 1500 >volts, and with full power almost burnt out two one-hundred watt >lamps! Before going on the air, I was concerned about that L/C >ratio, so I had a look at the waveform - it was dreadful - I >visualised strings of harmonics every 136 kHz well into the HF >region. I amended matters by reducing the grid drive from about >8 to 2 mA (with only a slight loss of efficiency), and included a >low pass filter in the output. > >I was now up and running, but at this stage the lack of >'operateability' of the receiver became a problem - I had to >jiggle two RF tuning controls; regeneration; and BFO, so decided >to build a superhet. I used 2 MHz for the IF (for which I could >wind coils) with a simple bridge circuit for the crystal filter >in which the capacity of the crystal (plus holder) is balanced by >a variable 'phasing' capacitor - which gives wide control of >selectivity: at exact balance, it was extremely sharp. > >The receiver works well and I have no trouble 'winkling' out the >DX, but have been disappointed in not being able to work outside >the British Isles. I have hopes, next autumn, of making >improvements to the antenna, at present only 80 ft long and >barely 20 ft high. I have some tall trees at the bottom of the >garden which either must go, or else serve as supports for the >end of the antenna (I am thinking an archer might help!). > >Vic Morse, G8IK > ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com