Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24187 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 09:37:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2001 09:37:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 22725 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 09:10:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 4 Jul 2001 09:10:32 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15HiW8-0008LB-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2001 10:00:16 +0100 Received: from relay.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.49]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15HiW3-0008L3-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2001 10:00:11 +0100 Received: (qmail 12145 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 09:58:07 +0100 X-Priority: 3 Received: from trtnmail.dera.gov.uk (146.80.9.56) by relay.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 4 Jul 2001 09:58:07 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 19666 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 10:01:22 +0100 Received: (ofmipd 192.5.29.90); 4 Jul 2001 09:01:00 -0000 Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id KAA02191; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 10:04:46 +0100 (BST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: (qmail 24316 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 09:52:00 -0000 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 4 Jul 2001 09:52:00 -0000 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id JAA15007; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:41:55 GMT Received: from unknown(10.71.64.31) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma014895; Wed, 4 Jul 01 09:41:17 GMT Received: from mailex.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:57:36 +0100 Received: (qmail 31515 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 08:48:30 +0100 Received: from softdnserror (HELO cchecker.dstl.gov.uk) (192.168.248.52) by mailex.dstl.gov.uk with SMTP; 4 Jul 2001 07:48:30 -0000 Received: from FRN-MAIL-R1.dstl.gov.uk (unverified) by cchecker.dstl.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.2) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 08:48:40 +0100 Received: by frn-mail-r1.dstl.gov.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:57:50 +0100 Date: 4 Jul 2001 09:57:55 +0100 Message-ID: <7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803D55C532@pdw-mail-r1.dstl.gov.uk> From: "Andrew Talbot" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Re. Net access on power lines etc. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Do you read Dave Lauder's EMC section in RadCom ?- it is often mentioned in there. RSGB were instrumental is setting up the expert group that defined the MPT1570 level for 9kHz to 150kHz. Unfortunately this ended somewhat up higher than we wanted due to pressure from certain groups pushing ADSL, but very much lower than that originally being put forward by PLT proponants. The pressure is now on to ensure radiated emisions in the 150kHz to 30MHz are set at realistic levels to protect HF.

I was originally part of the group with another hat on - trying to protect defence radio communication interests - but have now handed over to someone within this organisation more involved with international standards setting within the Nato environment. He is not an amateur, but is sympathetic to our interests - which at HF are not all that far removed from those of military operators.

Andy G4JNT

----Original Message-----
From: Laurie Mayhead [mailto:laurie@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk]
Sent: 2001-07-04 09:02
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re. Net access on power lines etc.
Finally he says " The radio amateur community should therefore participate in and contribute to the standards development process,which is mandated to CENELEC and ETSI"

Are we participating? I see very little mention of the subject in RadCom. Anyway it looks like its a fait accompli.

73s Laurie.





-- 

The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence

is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s).

For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, 

or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is

prohibited and may be unlawful.