Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12274 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 15:27:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 15:27:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 29562 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 15:26:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 15:26:30 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15PQPB-0006NX-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:16:57 +0100 Received: from [204.202.140.199] (helo=webmailmta.go.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15PQP7-0006NR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:16:53 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from gomailjtp01 ([10.212.0.161]) by mta07.seamail.go.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.10.12.16.25.p8) with ESMTP id <0GH100HADBQ13D@mta07.seamail.go.com> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:15:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "John Sexton" Subject: Re: LF: G8RW and NTL QRM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <597372.996074139665.JavaMail.computernetworks@gomailjtp01> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoMail 3.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Mike, Having had NTL cable Digital Plus installed here some months back, I can confirm that no new QRM on 136 has been observed here that could be attributed to that service. I do not use the E-mail service however. Several other neighbours also have NTL digital cable TV and no problems from them. So I would agree that the QRM that G8RW is suffering from is probably a result of a faulty installation, probably the PACE box. I haven't got round to fitting ferrite rings on the power supply to that box because so far I have not found it necessary. What I did find was that the previous Sky analogue box generated a lot of QRM until I fitted ferrite rings to the mains cable. 73 John, G4CNN -----Original Message----- From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed Jul 25 04:14:37 PDT 2001 Subject: LF: G8RW and NTL QRM >GW4ALG wrote:>> Recent letters from G8RW describe continuing QRM problems on 136 >> kHz from an NTL cable television interface installed in a >> neighbour's house. > >I am using NTL for my analogue cable TV, and have no trouble at all. The >cables (one for radio and one for TV, are within three metres of my antenna. >At least two of my neighbours use NTL's high speed internet connection >(cable modem) and I have no problem with those either. I suspect, but don't >know for sure, that at least one neighbour has NTL digital cable. My belief is >that the distribution is done on glass fibre, with local feeds in coax. All of this >suggests that the installation near Bob is faulty, not inherently noisy. > >Bob's next move should be to contact the RSGB EMC Committee (see RSGB >Yearbook or the web site, or phone HQ). This is a free service to RSGB >members and at least two other LFers have already benefited from it. > >Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) >http://www.lf.thersgb.net > > ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com