Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3714 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2001 17:29:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2001 17:29:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 3013 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2001 17:28:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 5 Jul 2001 17:28:25 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15ICpP-0007r2-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:22:11 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.92]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15ICpH-0007qx-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:22:07 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15ICnl-000KgK-0Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:20:29 +0100 Message-ID: <3B44A35A.353170AF@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:26:50 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "LF Group" Subject: LF: The Other Man's Station: G8IK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi All, Vic G8IK, located in Solihull, Birmingham, has been kind enough to write a personal account describing his first 2 years on LF. Vic writes: Initial 73 kHz tests -------------------- Seeking fresh fields, and pastures new, I thought I'd have a go at 73 - not very optimistic but I thought maybe someone else in this region might be similarly motivated. Luckily I had just purchased some coils at a rally and had sufficient for a simple receiver. I used FETs in three RF stages followed by a voltage doubling detector with regeneration to improve selectivity, then the usual audio stages. The coils were single windings with no coupling coils, so I used resistance capacity coupling between stages with very small coupling capacities to minimise damping of the tuned circuits. I have a number of accurate oscillators which, with Rugby, helped me to find the band. The receiver worked well, with plenty of gain and selectivity. For the rig, I used a small ferrite rod antenna, with a BC108 as oscillator tuned to the band with two 2000 pF compression trimmers, which drove two TIP126s in parallel. Using an 80 ohm power meter as load, these delivered 30 watts or more at 350 mA 80 v. In spite of a reasonable heatsink they overheated after a few minutes, so I made a multi-vibrator with an on-off ratio of 1:1, driving an on-off relay which enabled the rig to run for long periods. I wound a 2.5 litre drum full of 22 SWG wire (with taps) and, with the present antenna extended to about 170 ft (twice its present length), this resonated somewhere near the band. I had a variometer (a museum piece) which proved excellent for fine tuning. With everything in order, I switched the gear on and made my way, with the receiver, to a colleague who has a substantial antenna and who lives about a mile away, hoping that the signal would travel at least this distance, but no - not a trace! Success on 136 kHz ------------------ 136, I thought, offered more promise as the antenna would be effectively twice as high and twice as long. I retuned the gear to the new band and, to my delight, had a reply to my first CQ call: only seven miles away (G3YXM) but it was a start, and, to my amazement, this was followed by reports from G4GVC and GW4ALG. Thus encouraged, I decided to build a 200 watt rig - I had the main ingredients: two high voltage transformers, a 50 watt tetrode and two high voltage variable capacitors (45 pF Eddystone, ca 1935). I assembled all this on a 3 ft x 1 ft board with a hardboard panel of similar size, using the existing rig (down-powered) as the driver. My main problem was getting the right L/C ratio for the anode coil and, at the same time, allowing for the two variable capacitors (in parallel) to give some degree of tuning. I partly solved this by tapping the anode half-way down the coil (a 2.5 litre drum two thirds full of 22 SWG) and using rather less than the optimum tuning capacity (700 pF instead of 800-1000 pF). I wound a coupling coil at the cold end of the coil, and was ready to go. I'd arranged the power supplies to give me 500, 1000, or with the two in series, 1500 volts, and with full power almost burnt out two one-hundred watt lamps! Before going on the air, I was concerned about that L/C ratio, so I had a look at the waveform - it was dreadful - I visualised strings of harmonics every 136 kHz well into the HF region. I amended matters by reducing the grid drive from about 8 to 2 mA (with only a slight loss of efficiency), and included a low pass filter in the output. I was now up and running, but at this stage the lack of 'operateability' of the receiver became a problem - I had to jiggle two RF tuning controls; regeneration; and BFO, so decided to build a superhet. I used 2 MHz for the IF (for which I could wind coils) with a simple bridge circuit for the crystal filter in which the capacity of the crystal (plus holder) is balanced by a variable 'phasing' capacitor - which gives wide control of selectivity: at exact balance, it was extremely sharp. The receiver works well and I have no trouble 'winkling' out the DX, but have been disappointed in not being able to work outside the British Isles. I have hopes, next autumn, of making improvements to the antenna, at present only 80 ft long and barely 20 ft high. I have some tall trees at the bottom of the garden which either must go, or else serve as supports for the end of the antenna (I am thinking an archer might help!). Vic Morse, G8IK