Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11870 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2001 13:15:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 2001 13:15:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 17139 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2001 13:14:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 29 Jun 2001 13:14:01 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Fy03-0001Uo-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:07:55 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Fy02-0001Uj-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:07:55 +0100 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15FxzN-0004dR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:07:13 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=mj9ar) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 15FxzM-00047f-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:07:12 +0100 From: "James Moritz" Organization: University of Hertfordshire To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:08:35 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: QRV Sunday/Tuesday, QRO/QRP on LF X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) Message-ID: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear LF group, I am rather busy at work at the moment with deadlines to meet and so on, but I hope to be QRV on 136k on Sunday morning for the SAQ broadcast and event station. I'm not sure if I will have the energy to run my 73k beacon signal overnight, but I will if I can. I would also like to be QRV on 73kHz on Tuesday morning , but will probably be restricted to times before 0800utc - any good to anyone? Regarding the recent discussion on the use of QRP at LF, the transmitter power by itself does not mean much, without considering the antenna too. Most of the time during my "solo" trip to the Puckeridge Decca station last year, I was only running a fraction of a watt into the big antenna there, but was able to work D, SM and so on without great difficulty during the daytime. 5W to the antenna would have been close to the 1W ERP limit. Getting results with both low power and a small antenna is a significant achievement. But feeding kilowatts into a few metres of wire will get you a lot of corona and not much more signal. I would agree that building a TX and loading coil, etc, for 1 - 200W output is not really more complex or expensive than building a QRP LF station. Operating around the 1kW level brings a fresh set of problems... Using QRSS is quite a good way to extend the range of a low- power station - the computer you are reading this on is probably the only additional equipment needed. I did some tests with G3XDV a while ago where only a few milliwatts into my (at that time) 5m high inverted L gave Mike decent QRSS copy about 10km away. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU