Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2870 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 22:17:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 22:17:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 19801 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 22:16:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 8 Jun 2001 22:16:41 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 158UTz-0005aI-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 23:11:55 +0100 Received: from imo-m05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.8]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 158UTw-0005aD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 23:11:52 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id l.7f.15921029 (4365) for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:10:34 -0400 (EDT) From: MarkusVester@aol.com Message-ID: <7f.15921029.2852a759@aol.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:10:33 EDT Subject: LF: Re: Hell transmission, antenna height To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Windows 95 sub 72 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear Cesare, hi group, great to hear this! Yes, I had tried to answer your CQ's in Hell. Judging from what you have read, you were apparently watching in LSB mode, whereas I was transmitting USB (higher freq on top): "I5TGC DF6NM K" :-) . Tnx for the report, I hope we have another chance soon. This week, I have put an extra aluminium telescoping rod in the chimney beneath the fiberglass pole, elevating its tip from 6m to about 12m above our rooftop. Comparing the received voltage from DBF39 against a nonresonant loop, I measured the effective height as 9.3m. With a total loss resistance of 36 Ohms, I thus get 0.08% efficiency and about 100mW radiated power at 1.9A, some 5dB more than before. But its a little scary to see the makeshift mast bend in the wind, so I may soon have to retract it. 73 de Markus, DF6NM http://members.aol.com/DF6NM > Hi all > Yesterday evening, between 19.00 and 19.30 UTC, while I was sending > some unattended QRSS CQs, I've seen, around 137.72, an Hell signal, > unfortunately corrupted by the noise. At first I've read something as I2ACE > DL?KW, later I've read something as I2LCC D???? K. Some characters were > absolutely indecipherable, someone can give me some informations ? 73 > Cesare >