Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2449 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 13:55:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 13:55:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 4097 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 13:54:47 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 13:54:47 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 159S4v-0001PE-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:50:01 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 159S4t-0001Os-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:49:59 +0100 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id PAA1119856 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:49:20 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20010611144951.2c370646@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:49:51 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: [TECH] Help needed on toroid trasf. construction In-reply-to: <3B24ACC6.80671DF0@usa.net> References: <00c501c0ef45$d61a3ec0$5774ccd4@194.95.193.10.fen.baynet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Alberto, If you have access to Amidon cores I would try a ferrite toroidal core with the #72 or #77 material. For wideband applications these materials are rated for 0.5 -30 MHz. From my experience the frequencies given by Amidon are 0.5dB or at worst 1dB points, so for -3dB the range might be something like 0.2 - 70MHz Below 200kHz loss will increase, but at these frequencies the noise level is so high that you won't notice the few dB extra. Besides the material it is the number of windings that determine how 'wideband' a transformer is, more windings will improve the LF behavior (at cost of extra loss at the HF end) and vice versa. Experiment with the number of windings. A final tip : use a rather large toriod. It will allow you to space the windings and thus reducing the inter-winding capacitance (that often limits the upper frequency). 73, Rik ON7YD At 13:34 11/06/01 +0200, you wrote: >Hi all, > I need some words of wisdom and a bit of help about the >construction of a small toroid transformer. > >First the antefact : I swapped recently my TS-850 for a TS-950SDX, >a very fine radio, but much less sensitive on the LF band than the TS-850. >Looking at the schematics, and doing some filter simulation with >Electronic Workbench, I think to have found the culprit, i.e. L3, a small >toroidal transfomer, with ratio 1:4, which is inserted in the signal path, >after the input attenuator, and before the filters bank. With all probability, >its response at 136kHz leaves much to be desired. The TS-850 doesn't >have any such transformer, the signal goes straight to the filters. > >So I have decided to replace it. Looking in the MiniCircuits catalog, I have >found what seems to be the ideal replacement, the T4-6T-KK81 model, which >has a -3dB response from 10kHz to 100MHz. Problem is that this transformer >is not carried in stock by the Italian distributor, and both they and the >MiniCircuits sales office have a minimum quantity amount for an order. > >At this point the only choice is to build it myself. And this is were your help could >come in my rescue. I need to know what your experiences are in building >such a wideband kind of transformers. What is the best type of material, >caveats to not forget, optimal number of turns, you name it. > >TNX for any help, > >73 Alberto I2PHD > > > >