Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16479 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 10:47:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 10:47:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 152 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 10:46:47 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 10:46:47 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 155mJi-0005J4-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:38:06 +0100 Received: from ns3.swh.sk ([192.108.125.37]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 155mJc-0005Ix-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:38:01 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from hermes.swh.sk (hermes [192.108.125.60]) by ns3.swh.sk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f51AbBv29847 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:37:11 +0200 Received: from btss101a.swh.sk (btss.swh.sk [139.24.136.15]) by hermes.swh.sk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA28278 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:37:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by btss.swh.sk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:37:08 +0200 Message-ID: <29BDD4F529FCD311B631009027357C4E0225873C@btss103a.swh.sk> From: "Gasparik Richard" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: new LFers, contests, etc. Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:36:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: ...1 point for each new contact...etc...hard to compare the station in UK or western Europe with us, in central Europe. For example in range of 400 km I have worked since January 2000 only 10 LF station. Most of the stations are around 900km from my QTH. OH1TN have the same problem. To stimulate activity on LF we could have an activity contest (or activity weekend) but with rules dependent of the distance between stations worked (rules from VHF contests) or distance dependent points (something like Stew Perry Topband Distance Challenge). But this is not a solution how to increase activity. I'm contester (HF and VHF) and I know that after each big contest activity (like CQWW, ARRL or WPX) follows a deep inactivity. Look on 10m today...sometimes it's very hard to find any US station on the band. It looks like "no propagations"...but in the contest you may work hundred of them. I think we could increase the activity with some DX-peditions and demonstration stations during the hamradio meetings. Maybe some LF AWARDS should increase the activity too....But be careful with "599 QRZ" contest on 136kc... 73 de Rich OM2TW -----Original Message----- From: g3ldo [mailto:g3ldo@ukonline.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:47 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: new LFers, contests, etc. There has been some discussion on methods of increasing activity on the 136kHz band. The main objection to contest activity seems to be that it would degenerate into a '599 QRZ' type contacts. The Worthing radio club runs a contest with its members for activity an a particular band, usually 28MHz, for the number of contacts made over a period of a year. Over a long time span the fast exchanges are irelevant. We could do the same for 136kHz over a period - say from September 1st to April 30th. We could have 1 point for each new contact and a multiplier for each country. To stimulate activity in all modes we could have, say three basic modes 1. CW. 2 QRSS/DFCW. 3. PSK31/wolf. e.g. If you worked G0MRF on CW, QRSS and PSK31 this would count at three separate contacts. I had thought of an additional multiplier for a different continent but this would make it only in the reach of 'big guns'. The objective is to increase activity so I dont think continental multipliers help. What do you think? Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web