Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20768 invoked from network); 6 May 2001 19:52:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 6 May 2001 19:52:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 26543 invoked from network); 6 May 2001 19:51:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 6 May 2001 19:51:48 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14wUTt-0004ny-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2001 20:46:13 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.89]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14wUTr-0004nt-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 May 2001 20:46:12 +0100 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14wUTM-000Naj-0V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 6 May 2001 20:45:40 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3AF58211.1312A631@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 17:55:45 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Coupling between two antennas References: <001c01c0cee7$3843ab60$ba62883e@g3aqc> <000601c0cf47$124ae620$a7ce28c3@ericadodd> <001f01c0cfca$3bb5fda0$f4eb7ad5@dave> <3AEB2DBE.194E5A9C@alg.demon.co.uk> <003701c0d083$29305360$c16674d5@w8k3f0> <3AF41F62.BCD86ADD@alg.demon.co.uk> <002501c0d5a8$ecf253a0$9fb21bca@xtr743187> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: from GW4ALG> I'm very grateful to Bob ZL2CA for his important observations and comments. Firstly, a couple of points of clarification: 1) My loop is orientated in the vertical plane. It is a delta-loop, having a 65 m perimeter, fed at the top with balanced feeder. The line of the loop runs east-west, and therefore has deep nulls to the north and south - very handy for attenuating the noise sidebands from the Loran TX, located to the south of me (in France). Further details can be found at: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/loop.htm 2) The vertical antenna is located at one end of the loop. > The absolute gain of your short vertical will be higher than your > loop, so whatever figure of mutual coupling is found to apply, on > receive the loop will be affected more by the tuning situation of the > vertical than the other way round. With smaller frame loops for > receiving the impact of the vertical for reception on the loop is even > more pronounced (due to the much higher absolute gain of the vertical). I had not appreciated this important point before now. I guess it's one of those 'key facts' that every LFer needs to learn. > I find that on receive, unless the LF vertical transmitting antenna is > detuned, it receives local QRM from a fairly wide area and re-radiates > it to any LF receiving antenna on my property. Again, thanks for the tip, Bob. I'll try and detect that effect with my own set-up. Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG