Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21254 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 09:40:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 16 May 2001 09:40:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 24564 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 09:40:06 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 16 May 2001 09:40:06 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14zxgD-0006Cf-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:33:17 +0100 Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14zxg9-0006Ca-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:33:13 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id LAA1149532 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:32:40 +0200 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20010516103336.2b5f0e90@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:33:36 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: SV: LF: SV: Re. T/A tests. In-reply-to: <19998408.989949961771.JavaMail.imail@spike.excite.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello group, I am not sure that propagation on 137kHz is much correlated to 1.8 or 3.5MHz. On those bands (160m and 80m) DX propagation is mainly via reflection at the F2 layer and the signals are attenuated by the D (and eventually E) layer. During solar minimum the ionisation of the D and E layer is very weak while the F2 layer ionisation remains strong enough for these low frequencies. When I understand some articles about propagation on LF well, DX propagation is via E layer reflection (in some seldom cases even D-layer reflection). This would explain that QSO's up to 2000km (1 hop e-layer reflection) are made with rather low ERP (few 10mW) while transatlantic propagation (2 hops or more) require at least a few 100mW. Question is : will the E layer ionisation be strong enough at soloar minimum ? The answer will be known in a few years ... 73, Rik ON7YD At 11:05 15/05/01 -0700, you wrote: > >Hi Chris, >Terman's graphs show that T/A sig levels are strongest during peaks of the >solar cycle. Whereas the correlation that Laurie described is T/A success >when sunspot numbers are low. >My guess is that both are probably true, i.e. on average T/A signal levels >are better during the active part of the cycle, but conversely weak signals >are more likely to be disrupted during the active part. >We will probably find that at the low point of the cycle chances of getting >across are worse but consistently worse, if you follow me. >73, John > > > > > >_______________________________________________________ >Send a cool gift with your E-Card >http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > >