Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27623 invoked from network); 20 May 2001 21:18:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 20 May 2001 21:18:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 5658 invoked from network); 20 May 2001 21:17:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 20 May 2001 21:17:50 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 151aU8-0002V4-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 May 2001 22:11:32 +0100 Received: from neptune.imagenisp.com ([204.244.138.19]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 151aU7-0002Uz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 May 2001 22:11:31 +0100 Received: from jsm (gi82.imagenisp.com [204.244.17.109]) by neptune.imagenisp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id LGRLAA3L; Sun, 20 May 2001 14:10:54 -0700 Message-ID: <001501c0e171$b06a89a0$6d11f4cc@jsm> From: "Steve McDonald" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001301c0e130$d15ebaa0$6d11f4cc@jsm> <004001c0e16b$18b77380$55b51bca@xtr743187> Subject: LF: Re: Re: VA3LK to VE7 path still holding! Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 14:13:12 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Yes I was surprised by the strength of his signal. It would be fun to try some two-way tests now that I know I can hear Larry OK...problem is that I would need to apply for a temporary permit (not sure what my chances of getting approval would be) or wait until they give us a band! VE7SL / Steve > Steve, > > > The 3500 km path is still in good shape as of last night. Condx a little > > better than my last receive attempt but nowhere as good as they will be in > > the fall! > > I was impressed by your Argo screen showing the received signals very near > 599. > > 73, Bob >