Message-ID: <000d01c0dde0$cd6d9ea0$952b893e@g3aqc>
From: "Laurie Mayhead" <laurie@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <19998408.989949961771.JavaMail.imail@spike.excite.com>
Subject: Re: SV: LF: SV: Re. T/A tests.
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:18:00 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


----- Original Message -----
From: "john sexton" <computernetworks@excite.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: SV: LF: SV: Re. T/A tests.


>
> Hi Chris,
> Terman's graphs show that T/A sig levels are strongest during peaks of the
> solar cycle. Whereas the correlation that Laurie described is T/A success
> when sunspot numbers are low.
> My guess is that both are probably true, i.e. on average T/A signal levels
> are better during the active part of the cycle, but conversely weak
signals
> are more likely to be disrupted during the active part.
> We will probably find that at the low point of the cycle chances of
getting
> across are worse but consistently worse, if you follow me.
  Or at the high point,chances are greater but less consistant !
   Laurie
> 73, John
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
>
>
>