Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21984 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2001 21:10:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2001 21:10:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 4786 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2001 21:10:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 28 Apr 2001 21:10:03 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14tbf8-0005bW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:49:54 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from finch-post-12.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.41]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14tbf7-0005bR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:49:53 +0100 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by finch-post-12.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14tbed-000LWv-0C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 20:49:24 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3AEB2DBE.194E5A9C@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:53:18 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re. Pre-amps References: <001c01c0cee7$3843ab60$ba62883e@g3aqc> <000601c0cf47$124ae620$a7ce28c3@ericadodd> <001f01c0cfca$3bb5fda0$f4eb7ad5@dave> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dave G3YMC wrote: > I am following this thread with interest because as you know I use my > transmitting loop as an excellent receive antenna. I do not (yet) have > a vertical resonant antenna for the band - I would be interested in > Steve GW4ALG has any problems in loop detuning from his main antenna, > as his loop is of similar dimensions to mine. Although I have never noticed any detuning of my vertical antenna when adjusting the tuning of my loop antenna, the message from Dave prompted me to check this out right away. I have a single-turn delta loop of 65 m perimeter, and also find it excellent for receive. It is fed at the top using balanced feeder and is tuned & matched to 50 ohms with a balanced tuning unit. No pre-amp is used. Details can be found at: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/loop.htm My 12 m experimental vertical antenna is very close to one end of the loop. For details see: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/experi_vert.htm This evening, when monitoring the TX SWR into the resonant vertical (very close to 1:1), I found no change in SWR when: - tuning the loop antenna either side of resonance (with the coax-side of the tuner terminated in 50 ohms); - disconnecting the shack end of the balanced feeder from the tuner; - applying a short circuit to the shack end of the balanced feeder; or, - grounding the shorted balanced feeder. As you can imagine, the tuning of my short vertical is very sharp. I can even see the SWR change when the wind blows. So I'm very surprised that there appears to be so significant interaction between the two antennas. Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG