Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5149 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2001 16:01:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Mar 2001 16:01:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 25739 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2001 16:01:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 10 Mar 2001 16:01:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14bliL-0000JI-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:55:29 +0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail-7.tiscalinet.it ([195.130.225.153] helo=mail.tiscalinet.it) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14bliK-0000JD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:55:28 +0000 Received: from orion.pii.net (62.11.62.0) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.015.5) id 3AA4B71F000FB0AD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 16:54:59 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: (from clapo@localhost) by orion.pii.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA01250 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 16:48:46 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on Linux X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <3.0.1.16.20010307120313.08b7191a@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 16:48:46 +0100 (CET) From: "Claudio" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Transatlantic modes - what next? Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello LF group, I agree with Rik arguments about BPSK and I add some more considerations. On 07-Mar-01 Rik Strobbe wrote: > Hello Jim & group, > > Excellent paper from Jim, it seems a good starting point for an open > discussion. > > SNIP > > An additional difference occurs at the RX side. QRSS/DFCW are received > 'wideband', this means you can observe a rather big part of the spectrum > for DFCW/QRSS signals. This has the advantage that, even at signal > bandwidths of 0.01Hz, there is nor problem to 'hit' the transmitted signal. > One can even 'decode' more that one signal at the same time. Opposite to > this all receiving software for BPSK / WOLF is 'narrowband'. This means > that you have to 'hit' the transmitted signal very accurate and you can > receive only 1 signal at a time. > > SNIP > So far my contribution, > > 73, Rik ON7YD BPSK modulation is very sensitive to carrier frequency shift or difference between transmitter and receiver. The receiver must be frequency locked to the carrier, if the difference between TX and RX frequency is more that one tenth of the bit rate you must add some circuit to scan the RX frequency and lock the receiver local oscillator (do it in hardware or software, doesn't matter) to the carrier (kiked oscillator ;-) ). After the carrier is locked, the receiver does lock the data bit clock, this require a training sequence (some data bits that doesn't carry useful informations) and synchronize the RX side data rate clock with the transmit side. Those bits are lost and add some time to QSO time. In general BPSK is easy to implement for hight bit rate I think that you can ask more to some OSCAR satellite guru about the BPSK modulation. 73 de Claudio, ik2pii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Claudio Pozzi http://www.qsl.net/ik2pii happy Linux user E-Mail: Claudio Date: 10-Mar-01 Time: 16:26:23 This message was sent by XFMail ----------------------------------------------------------------------