Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <65AECDF1F89AD411900400508BFC869F9C03E6@pdw-mail-1.dera.gov.uk>
From: "Talbot Andrew" <ACTALBOT@dera.gov.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: Re: WOLF  - am I missing something ?
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:20:40 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

PowerBasic (the language I use) does incorporate a "microtimer"
instruction for measuring time to 1us so something has always been
available in the underlying hardware in the PC,   via the same timer
chip that generates sounds from the PC speaker.  

However, it becomes inaccurate for intervals > 55ms as the timing
function get messed up by the DOS Heartbeat interrupt at 18.2Hz.  Also
(at least in PBasic) it cannot be used to set a delay, only for
measuring an interval.    Back in the Dark Ages, I used  a FOR / NEXT
loop with a fixed count, accurately timed this using the microtimer,
then generated a calibration factor for subsequently using in the loop
to generate software timings.   Once again this was upset every 55ms,
but did work satisfactorily with a Pico Products 8 bit A/D on the
printer port for first forays into DSP.  Then I abandonned software
timing by using an external interface (a PIC) on the serial port and
ended up with something very similar to the VE2IQ I/F.

Andy  G4JNT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alberto di Bene [mailto:dibene@usa.net]
> Sent: 2001-03-20 13:36
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: Re: WOLF - am I missing something ?
> 
> 
> > We all have to accept that doing any sort of accurate 
> timing operation
> > on a PC is futile - whether Soundacard, serial port or, 
> even worse, by
> > software timing.   Therefore some sort of external interface really
> > should be used to resynchronise Tx and Rx data samples        .
> 
> Hmm, perhaps not all is lost. The Pentium II class CPUs and 
> the Athlons
> do have the so-called Performance Timer, an hardware timer
> that can be queried through Windoze APIs, with resolution 
> around 1 usec.
> 
> This however would rule out old Pentiums, 486 and the AMD K6, which do
> not have that counter.
> 
> 73   Alberto   I2PHD
> 
> 
> 


-- 
The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence
is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s).
For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is
prohibited and may be unlawful.