Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1369 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2001 08:48:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 08:48:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 1137 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2001 08:48:51 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 08:48:51 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14fHkY-0000GQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:44:18 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14fHkX-0000GL-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:44:17 +0000 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA109560 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:43:55 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20010320094329.2dbf5db2@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:43:29 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: WOLF BPSK tests tonight In-reply-to: <4736.200103191732@gemini> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Jim, Sorry, I couldn't be QRV last night. Regarding power levels : On a second thought it is OK for me if you run high power for the TA test. I can reduce your SRN by receiving on a short piece of wire. If I keep the wire indoor the household electronics will provide sufficient noise. At a later stage it might be interesting to have a test sequence with reduced power level for inter-EU testing, eventually during daytime (weekend). Meanwhile it might be to know whe, beside Wolf end me, is equiped (and interested) in WOLF tests (in Europe). 73, Rik ON7YD At 17:37 19/03/01 +0000, you wrote: >Dear Wolf, Rik, LF Group, > >I will try some lower power WOLF BPSK tests tonight, starting >about 2000utc. Because different stations are experiencing widely >different signal levels, and since with weak signals the WOLF >software requires quite a long run of signal to successfully decode, >I will start off with big steps in power level every 20mins or so, so >we can determine roughly what levels will be interesting for future >tests. > >I will start at the 300mW ERP level, and reduce power in 10dB >steps - say 30mW, 3mW, 300uW. At each step change I will >transmit the CW station ID and the ERP level for the next period, >followed by 3 minutes of carrier for frequency checking, all >transmitted at full power. Then I will reduce the TX power level and >start sending BPSK, until the next station ID. The frequency will be >137.500kHz again. I will listen on the frequency afterwards if >anybody wants to call in CW about the tests. At some time >between 2300 and 0000, I will start up again with the full 1W ERP >for the benefit of North American stations. > >I hope this is OK - let me know if you would prefer something >different! > >Cheers, Jim Moritz >73 de M0BMU > >