Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2769 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 09:53:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 09:53:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 3247 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 09:53:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 09:53:42 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VVs1-0003gY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:47:37 +0000 Received: from bob.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VVrz-0003gT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:47:36 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id JAA23432; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:49:26 GMT Received: (qmail 10503 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 10:39:44 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 10:39:44 -0000 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id KAA23338; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:28:46 GMT Received: from unknown(10.71.64.31) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma023225; Wed, 21 Feb 01 10:28:18 GMT Received: from frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:51:16 +0000 Received: by frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id <18PLN84L>; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:46:45 -0000 Message-ID: <65AECDF1F89AD411900400508BFC869F0D75DC@pdw-mail-1.dera.gov.uk> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: Splitting the reflector. Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:46:52 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I think it rather sad and a sorry state of affairs for amateur radio that there are people out there who may not be interested in the technical side and presumably just want to be appliance operators. I thought we were all supposed to be experimenters by virtue of the amateur licence How about, instead, the word OPER in the subject so we don't have to bother with the who-heard-who messages. Andy G4JNT > -----Original Message----- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bryant@virgin.net] > Sent: 2001-02-21 09:08 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Splitting the reflector. > > > How about in the short term we agree to put an unambiguous marker > in the subject line for the high tech postings (ie [TECH]) and then > subscribers who do not want to see the postings can filter > them straight > to the bit bucket. > > Stewart G3YSX > > Vincent Ferme wrote: > > > Group, > > > > My preference is that we continue using this mailing list > for all LF related > > topics. I remember the QRP group going through the same > debate no once but a > > couple of times in the recent past. Other QRP mailing lists > have been setup > > but they failed to solve the perceived problems. They > actually caused more > > problems for people that did not want to miss anything and > subscribed to > > them and ended up having to deal with lots of cross-posted messages. > > > > Respectfully submitted. > > > > 73 de Vince, VA3VF. > > -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.