Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15407 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 11:28:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 11:28:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 29812 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 11:28:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 11:28:35 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14UoNB-0005nU-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:20:53 +0000 Received: from bob.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14UoN9-0005nP-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:20:52 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id LAA06723; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:22:40 GMT Received: (qmail 10592 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 12:13:06 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 12:13:06 -0000 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id MAA21473; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:02:18 GMT Received: from unknown(10.71.64.31) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma021343; Mon, 19 Feb 01 12:01:39 GMT Received: from FRN-MAIL-3.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:24:20 +0000 Received: by frn-mail-3.dera.gov.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <10C3QHNY>; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:19:42 -0000 Message-ID: <65AECDF1F89AD411900400508BFC869F0D75C4@pdw-mail-1.dera.gov.uk> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: "LF Group \(E-mail\)" Subject: LF: Re:Active antenna Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:19:52 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: A few years ago I made an active broadband loop antenna for HF for 'official' purposes. This consisted of a 300mm diameter loop of 3mm copper wire into a common base amplifier made from a 2N5109 transistor operated with 50mA collector current. The input impedance was about 0.5 ohm with a collector load of 50 ohms, and no negative feedback was used for a reasonably flat response across the higher part of the HF spectrum. Performing down to 2MHz at least, although sensitivity was falling off there it still gave more than enough signal to hear background noise. This loop vastly outperformed the commercial Procomm active whips we were using at that time as HF collection antennas and even performed better than a homebrew active E Field plus high impedance amp design, based on one in VHF communications some ten years ago (which itself easily outperformed the Procomm). Furthermore, it was immune to the huge locally generated interference levels on this hill overlooking the industrial areas of north Portsmouth ! The ony reason we didn't go ahead with a whole array of these and instead stayed with E Field whips was that the loops were directional against vertically polarised signals. Which was something definitely not wanted at the time. However its omnidirectional properties for H-Pol signals when mounted horizontally made it a good antenna for low angle skywave detection. Such an amplifier with a 1m loop consisting of a few turns of wire would make an excellent LF antenna and could cope with strong signals up to nearly 1 Watt input before overloading. Purely for LF work, an op-amp with feedback could be used and perhaps an even lower input impedance can be achieved. Andy G4JNT >This is compensated by the negative feedback . >The active antenna has a frequency response that is flat from 5kHz to over >30MHz. It stays linear in field strengths up to 10V/m. Great attention has >also been given to proper noise behaviour ("noisemanship"). The input is >protected by diodes against high voltages. Because signal voltages at the >input are very small due to the low input impedance little signal current >flows into the diodes and they do not impair the favourable characteristic >of the active antenna. -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.