Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29884 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2001 13:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Feb 2001 13:00:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 10788 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2001 13:03:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 1 Feb 2001 13:03:14 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14OJHS-0002zU-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2001 12:56:06 +0000 Received: from bob.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.90]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14OJHQ-0002zN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2001 12:56:05 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: by bob.dera.gov.uk; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id MAA04357; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:57:28 GMT Received: (qmail 13950 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2001 13:49:04 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk (172.16.9.10) by baton.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 1 Feb 2001 13:49:04 -0000 Received: by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk; id NAA09936; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:39:44 GMT Received: from unknown(10.71.64.31) by gauntlet.mail.dera.gov.uk via smap (3.2) id xma009820; Thu, 1 Feb 01 13:39:14 GMT Received: from frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk (unverified) by mailguard.dera.gov.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:58:53 +0000 Received: by frn-gold-1.dera.gov.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id <1ATQD5RT>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:55:10 -0000 Message-ID: <65AECDF1F89AD411900400508BFC869F0D758B@pdw-mail-1.dera.gov.uk> From: "Talbot Andrew" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: 3C85 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:55:09 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: > Does anyone know the permability and spec of 3c85 material? I cannot find > this info in any of my tech info books. The T200 series seem very low like u10 powdered iron whereas > the 3c5 ferrite type are as high as u7000 Seems important to get the right mix > g3kev > For ferrite material used in transformers the Ur is irrelevant so long as it is 'High' enough to ensure magnetising current is negligable compared with that current transferred through to the secondary. Permeability of high Ur ferrites is a very unstable parameter anyway, and shifts wildly with temperature and flux density. Once a suitable ferrite for power and frequency is identified, the important thing is Bmax which is a function of Volt-seconds, core area and turns. The parameter affecting upper frequency performance is the hysteresis losses in the material, and overall losses with increasing power mean that total ferrite volume scales with power transferred across the transformer. 'Better' ferrites have lower hysteresis loss at higher frequencies, but very rarely can Bmax ever much above 0.2 Tesla with modern materials, so provided this vital parameter is never exceeded, transformers using a ferrite appropriate to the frequency, and size suitable for the power will work OK. To get an idea of what core size can do what, look at some SMPSU transformers as used in computer power supplies. Modern 200W supplies use a surprisingly small core and they operate in the region of 100 - 200kHz. When carrying a sine wave I have found that a given core is a lot more efficient than when carrying a squarewave, and can use less turns, so a core from a 200W SMPSU is probably going to be adequate for a 400W 137k sinewave signal. For Iron dust (or ferrite dust, or ferrite with an airgap) the material serves only to 'conduct' the magnetic field into a small airgap and this defines the total inductance. For a gapped ferrite core the gap dimensions are exact and can be measured. Inductance can then be determined quite accurately from the width and area of the gap alone PROVIDED the ferrite has a high enough Ur to not influence the total value (analogy: small and large resistors in parallel) and is not saturating. The result is that a standard sized gapped core then has a specific inductance specified in Henries per (turn squared). In dust cores, of course, the gap cannnot be identified physically and the specification is then replaced by the specific inductance value only. Permeability can be a bit more accurately defined now as it depends mainly on the gap rather than the magnetic material, hence is defined in manufacture by particle size, mix density etc, but is not as useful a parameter as Al. The frequency limits are defined by the losses in the material making up the body of the core. Bmax rules still apply, so Vrms = 4.44.F.N.A.B should still be used to derive the minimum number of turns needed to prevent saturation, and again power handling scales with the material volume. Don't add too many extra turns to try to reduce B too much, as then copper losses begin to creep up offset against diminishing returns on core losses. For professional large PSU transformer designs, considerable effort is spent carefully trading off copper losses and core losses to maximise efficiency, primarily to reduce heating. Iron dust 200 cores mean 200 (units of 0.01") in diameter and the following number (and colour of the coating) shows which frequency family they belong to. The ARRL Handbook (all editions for the last 25 years) contains an excelent set of Iron dust core specifications. Andy G4JNT > -- The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.