Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24853 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 20:11:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 20:11:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 1913 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 20:11:08 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 20:11:08 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VfVO-0007Ke-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:04:54 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail-7.tiscalinet.it ([195.130.225.153] helo=mail.tiscalinet.it) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VfVN-0007KZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:04:54 +0000 Received: from ath650 (62.10.39.213) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.015.5) id 3A83605700299FFE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:04:01 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:04:01 +0100 (added by postmaster@mail.tiscalinet.it) Message-ID: <4.1.20010221205017.00a068b0@pop.tiscalinet.it> X-Sender: spin.elec@pop.tiscalinet.it X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Versione 4.1 Data: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:02:14 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Marco Bruno IK1ODO" Subject: Re: LF: Reflector split?...please No. In-reply-to: <000201c09c33$feb1bc60$784e7ad5@default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi all, I agree with Alan, Alberto and others. Please, don't split the reflector! The knowlwdge and wisdom of the list is very great. Today an OM may be interested in the last issues about millihertz-wide coding, tomorrow in receiving loops or reception reports. One thing should not exclude the other; we do it for fun, not for profession! Some clever prefix to messages will help in reading, of course. The same happens in other lists (look to WUN, they use MIL, DIG, MAR, MISC to discriminate, and the traffic volume is similar to this reflector). To split will be a one-way process - this reflector is unique like the band we are using, and ban-plans and other kind of gentleman agreements would be very difficult to handle then. 73 - Marco IK1ODO (reading and saving EVERY message of this list since August 1st, 1998)