Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21825 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 14:35:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Feb 2001 14:35:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 26306 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 14:35:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 25 Feb 2001 14:35:16 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14X21y-0003P7-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:20:10 +0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from d06lmsgate-2.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.2]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14X21v-0003Of-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:20:07 +0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.147]) by d06lmsgate-2.uk.ibm.com (1.0.0) with ESMTP id OAA19950 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:04:31 GMT Received: from usa.net (ss9.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.75]) by d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id OAA104598 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:19:12 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A99141C.A1F1B115@usa.net> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 15:18:04 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" Organization: Undisclosed X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: G3NYK/PA0SE-bridges References: <000701c09dcf$6830e5c0$14b401d5@default> <14WhOa-2CnHRwC@fwd03.sul.t-online.com> <005d01c09f15$48ddd100$a77a74d5@w8k3f0> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dick Rollema wrote: > [snip] > I tested my bridges by connecting them to a 3 m long piece of RG213 type 50 > ohm coax that was terminated by a 50 ohm resistor (actually two 100 ohm > resistors in parallel). That produces a standing wave ratio of 2 in the > cable. Dick, maybe today I'm a bit denser than the usual. If your RG213 cable was terminated on its typical impedance, shouldn't the SWR have been 1:1 ? The 50 ohm resistor at the end should have entirely absorbed the RF energy with no reflections. But maybe I misunderstood you. Thanks for any clarification. 73 Alberto I2PHD