Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21634 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 09:23:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 09:23:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 5585 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 09:23:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 09:23:24 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VVIS-0003Sp-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:10:52 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from jaws.cisco.com ([198.135.0.150] helo=cisco.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VVIQ-0003Sh-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:10:51 +0000 Received: from virgin.net (stbryant-isdn-home.cisco.com [10.49.137.202]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA06991 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:10:01 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A93855D.CEA1171D@virgin.net> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:07:41 +0000 From: "Stewart Bryant" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Splitting the reflector. References: <37.10fc5a30.27c44a8b@aol.com> <002101c09b9c$2ba968a0$a07e6395@vince> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: How about in the short term we agree to put an unambiguous marker in the subject line for the high tech postings (ie [TECH]) and then subscribers who do not want to see the postings can filter them straight to the bit bucket. Stewart G3YSX Vincent Ferme wrote: > Group, > > My preference is that we continue using this mailing list for all LF related > topics. I remember the QRP group going through the same debate no once but a > couple of times in the recent past. Other QRP mailing lists have been setup > but they failed to solve the perceived problems. They actually caused more > problems for people that did not want to miss anything and subscribed to > them and ended up having to deal with lots of cross-posted messages. > > Respectfully submitted. > > 73 de Vince, VA3VF.