Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13458 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 11:46:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 11:46:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 21935 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 11:49:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 11:49:02 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14PjrM-0005d3-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:31:04 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [213.2.16.106] (helo=rsgb.org.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14PjrL-0005cy-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:31:03 +0000 Received: from miked by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.7.5.R) for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:20:50 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:20:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: Argo - even better Message-ID: <3A7E8C90.13273.69943D@localhost> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Alberto, Once again you have made some really useful improvements to the excellent Argo (new Build 119). In particular, the frequency calibration facility is superb. I tried it on the 90s setting and found I could alter the calibration down to 0.01Hz. I was previously setting the AF out of my IC-706 to, say, 790Hz for 137.790kHz to get direct frequency readout on Argo. The BFO is only in 10Hz steps, so I had to offset the main tuning to achieve a good readout on Argo. Now I can select BBC 198.000kHz on VFO A, calibrate Argo, then use VFO B knowing that the frequency readout on 136kHz is accurate to better than 0.1Hz. Brilliant. One suggestion, can we have more frequency ticks, please. When in 90s mode the screen is about 1Hz high but the ticks are no better than 1Hz. Ticks at 0.1Hz would be useful. Thanks. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.lf.thersgb.net