Message-ID: <3A7D7183.A68E6D77@virgin.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 15:13:07 +0000
From: "Stewart Bryant" <stewart.bryant@virgin.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: TR QSO TIME
References: <000001c08d15$279241a0$2b0e883e@default>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

>
> I would agree that a qso on slow morse could take a few hours during a
> session and that would be acceptable but to call back next day with a reply
> is stupid and not credible.

I can think of a number of military systems that operate on this basis. Are you
suggesting that the stations are not in communication?


> The next suggestion by some will be a week long qso!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is
> hardly state of the art communications and puts the clock back, dont suppose
> it ever took anyone 24 hours plus to have a two way contact even druing the
> pioneering days!!!!!!!!

Depends what you mean by pioneering. I would have thought that this low
power LF work was pioneering.

Stewart G3YSX