Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2001 13:30:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Feb 2001 13:30:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 21304 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2001 13:30:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 22 Feb 2001 13:30:49 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VviH-0004at-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:23:17 +0000 Received: from ds-img-3.compuserve.com ([149.174.206.136] helo=spdmgaac.compuserve.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VviF-0004ao-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:23:16 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spdmgaac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) id IAA18512 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:22:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:21:33 -0500 From: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" Subject: LF: ANTS: Higher L - higher ERP To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200102220821_MC2-C677-D8CB@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Mike, G3XDV wrote > >I look forward to further discussion on exactly what theory fits this >practical result. > I don't think I can add a good portion of theory why it works, however, I can through my two cents into the discussion supporting what Mike (and other's) have found out when we elevated our loading coils. When I started with my 18m umbrella antenna (based on a fiberglas-mast, for details see http://www.qru.de/station.htm) I used a 3.8 mH coilt that was inside my shack, basically at the base of my antenna. When I decided to bring a 3.8 mH coil 1/3 up the mast height (= 6m above ground) I could measure DCF39 coming in about 2 dB better. Reports from other stations as well as actual field strength measurements that I performed indicated that I gained even more dBs on my transmit way. As the actual mast that carries the antenna is a fiberglas telescope mast, the loading coil is not disturbed by and metal around it other than the antenna wire itself. My explanation for the un-symetrical gain on RX and TX: with the coil being in my shack and a voltage of around 10 kV at the top of the coil the losses from the antenna wire along the wall and especially through the wall might have eaten up some of the power I tried to radiate simply by shortcutting the voltage to ground. After I now have only a 900 uH variometer in my shack for fine-tuning, the voltage fell probaly to less than 1 kV and, accordingly the losses inside my shack are much lower, helping to increase the overall ERP. As said in an earlier mail where we discussed how to isolate the coil against rain, snow, etc. I described that my coil is not protected at all against humidity or snow. With 350 Watt output I have no flashover problems. From field strength measurment I estimate my ERP (not EMRP) to be around 350 mW, giving an overall 'gain' of this antenna configuration of around -30 dB. Best 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)