Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24470 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 16:24:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Feb 2001 16:24:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 14299 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 16:24:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 25 Feb 2001 16:24:35 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14X3jn-00045g-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 16:09:31 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14X3jm-00045b-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 16:09:30 +0000 Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.com by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14X3jK-0001Z0-07; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 17:09:02 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from (087321565-0001@[217.2.41.66]) by fwd02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14X3jF-0zUM3EC; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 17:08:57 +0100 From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701c09dcf$6830e5c0$14b401d5@default> <14WhOa-2CnHRwC@fwd03.sul.t-online.com> <005d01c09f15$48ddd100$a77a74d5@w8k3f0> <3A9927E3.90237721@sitestar.net> Subject: LF: Re: Steckdosen-Amateur X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 17:08:57 +0100 Message-ID: <14X3jF-0zUM3EC@fwd02.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 087321565-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear all, I was also wondering that PA0SE has used this german expression here which, as far as I can recall, had been created already in the sixties. "Steckdose" means wall socket, power point, mains outlet. A "Steckdosenamateur" is the same what in other languages is called an appliance operator or a radio amateur who just wants to "plug and play". OK? Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB Rye Gewalt schrieb: > For the benefit of a poor yank who only speaks one language and wished he > could > speak several, what's the literal translation of "steckdose"? I am always > looking for derogatory names for non tinkers and view-grap engineers. I am > soldering iron burns up to my elbows in spite of a (very old) degree in math. > Somehow I like to smell the smoke..... > > Regards > Rye > K9LCJ > Springfield, VA > > Dick Rollema wrote: > > > Uwe, DJ8WX, wrote: > > > > > Dick, where did you get that Wayne-Kerr-B.601-bridge from ? > > > could one purchase it somewhere? > > > > I have two Wayne Kerr admittance bridges: > > > > Type B601: 15 kHz - 15 MHz > > > > Type B801: 1 MHz - 100 MHz > > > > But my home made noise bridge performs almost as well. I took great care to > > make it frequency independent and succeeded in doing so up to 30 MHz. > > > > I bought the Wayne Kerr bridges for little money in a war surplus shop and > > at a rally of the Dutch Society for the History of Radio. > > You can usually pick up older type of test equipment at rallies at low > > prices because most present day amateurs are of the "Steckdose" type > > and are not at all interested in measuring gear. > > > > I tested my bridges by connecting them to a 3 m long piece of RG213 type 50 > > ohm coax that was terminated by a 50 ohm resistor (actually two 100 ohm > > resistors in parallel). That produces a standing wave ratio of 2 in the > > cable. The impedance at the input of the cable was measured at a range of > > frequencies up to 30 MHz. When the results are plotted on a RX-diagram they > > must lie on a circle; the one for SWR = 2. For the Wayne Kerr bridges this > > was indeed the case. But the deviation from the circle was also very small > > for my home made bridge. Only 30 MHz near the measured impedances tended to > > lie inside the circle for all three bridges. This was caused by the loss in > > the coax that made the SWR < 2 at the input of the cable. > > > > > BTW.Dick, I just answered ur cq on 136 kHz. sri u did not hear my signal. > > u > > > where 559 in j043sv (ant: inverted V with 340m es 400m lws). > > > > A pity I did not hear you. Perhaps some other time? > > > > 73, Dick, PA0SE > >