Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1637 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 00:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 00:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 18160 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 00:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 00:37:48 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VNCv-0000nW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:32:37 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VNCu-0000nQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:32:36 +0000 Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.com by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14VNCd-0004OV-01; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 01:32:19 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from (0482183881-0001@[62.156.6.193]) by fwd04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14VNCW-1UOht2C; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 01:32:12 +0100 From: "jannsen" <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3.0.1.16.20010220161231.234787ae@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Subject: Re: LF: QRS software X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 01:32:12 +0100 Message-ID: <14VNCW-1UOht2C@fwd04.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 0482183881-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik Strobbe schrieb: > At the moment I am working on a new version of QRS that allows longer > dotlengths (up to 1 hour/dot) and has more precise timing. > > As I hope to reach most users of QRS via this reflector I have one question : > Is anyone currently using the QSK facility ? > > The combination of QSK and precise timing will cause some major changes in > the programme (and some extra hours of work). I am willing to keep the QSK > facility if there is some interest in this option, otherwise I will abandon > QSK. > In case you want me to keep the QSK option, please let me know. > > 73, Rik ON7YD > > Hi Rik, I use ur qrs-progr since several months for antenna tests; i.e. beaconing the tx (vy low pwr) and taking the fieldstrength far away. and so I will do I guess the next years ! imposs. without ur progr., Rik.tks for it. if I have got a wish free: the dot length of max 60000 msec could be higher for the purpose I use it. regards Uwe, dj8wx, qsl.net/dj8wx