Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24481 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 13:13:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 13:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 26168 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 13:07:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 13:07:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14PlB1-00068F-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:55:27 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.82]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14PlAz-00066T-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:55:26 +0000 Received: from fwd00.sul.t-online.com by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14PlAh-0007CZ-01; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 13:55:07 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from (087321565-0001@[217.2.68.53]) by fwd00.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14PlAY-0LLDLGC; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:54:58 +0100 From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3A7E870B.22556.5402A0@localhost> Subject: Re: LF: Earthing the mast X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:54:58 +0100 Message-ID: <14PlAY-0LLDLGC@fwd00.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 087321565-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Thank You for this description! I would recommend: Keep both masts grounded. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB Mike Dennison schrieb: > A few weeks ago there was a discussion about whether to earth > masts, or leave them 'floating'. > > In the continuous search for more dBs I tried earthing my mast on > Saturday. > > I have a 14m (45ft) mast attached to the brick wall of the house by > 'T' and 'K' brackets, standing off about 300mm (1ft). Its base is > 600mm (2ft) above ground level. The vertical part of the antenna is > about 1m (3ft) away from the mast. > > I connected the mast to the wire which runs from the Tx to the earth > stakes. I expected the capacitance between the mast and the > vertical to change the tuning. The change was in fact very small, but > the first thing I noticed was the variometer tuning became much > more critical. The second thing was a 10 per cent increase in > antenna current. Conclusion: the Q of the antenna had increased. > > I was still prepared to believe that I had simply added a capacitor > from the antenna to earth, but when I checked the receive > performance the signals improved by 1-2dB (tested by monitoring > DCF and detuning until one of the 'S-meter' LCD blobs flickered, > then noting that the blob stayed on with the earth connected), and > the local noise level reduced at the same time. > > Another effect, in the short time since I made this change, has been > the antenna current has been stable. Before, it would vary by > between 10 and 20 percent from one day to the next, depending on > the weather, and I assumed this was absorption by trees. > > It seems that the mast/wall was acting as a resistor to earth, > absorbing a different amount of RF from day to day. > > I also earthed the mast at the far end of my inverted-L and > connected the two with a wire, but this had much less effect. This > mast is already stuck in the mud at its base so was probably already > earthy. > > What to do next? > > Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) > http://www.lf.thersgb.net > >