Return-Path: Received: (qmail 965 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2001 10:25:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 7 Feb 2001 10:25:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 8696 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2001 10:28:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 7 Feb 2001 10:28:44 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14QRkp-0004TU-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 10:23:15 +0000 Received: from [195.47.110.226] (helo=dell1.gmccz.cz.gmc.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14QRko-0004TP-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 10:23:14 +0000 Received: from p (p.maly.gmccz.cz.gmc.net [192.168.1.22]) by dell1.gmccz.cz.gmc.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id DV58S4MJ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:24:21 +0100 Message-ID: <00c901c090ef$e67848c0$1601a8c0@maly.gmccz.cz.gmc.net> From: "Petr Maly" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3.0.1.16.20010207112258.2c8f0b36@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Subject: LF: Re: QRS software Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:22:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: The EasyGram http://www.sweb.cz/ok1fig/EasyGram.htm is currently limited to dot length 10 minutes. No problem to make it longer if required. Petr OK1FIG ----- Original Message ----- From: Rik Strobbe To: Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: LF: QRS software > At 12:04 5/02/01 -0500, N4ICK wrote: > >The only limitation would be the ON7YD QRS program: does it allow us to > go > >slower? (I cannot remember its parameters, and the actual software is > at the > >transmitter site, of course, not here in my shack, so I cannot check > now how > >slow it will go). > > So far QRS allows up to 65 seconds 'element length'. Reason for this is > that the dotlength is calculated in multiples of 0.1 second and are > handled > as WORD values (2 byte). At the time I released this version 3 sec./dot > was > common practice with an odd one using 10 sec./dot, so the 65 seconds > limit > seemed fairly save. > Laurie pointed out this problem to me a few days ago and I made a 'quick > fix' that now allows up to 10 minutes dot length. Whoever is interested > in > transmitting at very slow speed can request a copy of the new version > via > e-mail. > > In the near future I intend to release a new revision of QRS, giving > more > facilities for very long dotlengths. > > Following 'features' are planned : > > - although meanwhile DELPHI 5 is available I will stick to DELPHI 1 as > this > allows the software to run under WIN3.1 and upward. This will allow to > use > old PC's (even a 386) for beaconing etc ... > > - timing will be more accurate. So far I used the 'internal timer' of > DELPHI that has the advantage of 100% 'no interference' with other > software > but is not so accurate (few % error). At 3 sec./dot this error is > neglectible but at 60 sec./dot it can be noticed. Meanwhile I managed to > work arround this problem and get a accurate timing without interference > with other software. > > - fast CW facilities will be abandoned, except for the possibility to > have > a fast CW text at the begin and end of your QRSS/DFCW transmission > > - dot lengths will be given in seconds instead of milliseconds (entering > 60000 for 1 minute dotlength is not practical) > > - maximum dot length will be 86400 seconds (= 1 day), this should > satisfy > the needs for even the slowest QRSS (for the time being) > > - possibility to 'synchronize' transmissions to the PC-clock (eg. allow > to > transmit at 60 sec./dot where each dot starts exactly at the beginning > of > the minute). > > In case you have a 'wishlist' of other features that could be usefull, > please let me know ASAP. If possible I will try to implement them. > > 73, Rik ON7YD > >