Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22982 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2001 09:29:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Feb 2001 09:29:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 2369 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2001 09:28:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 20 Feb 2001 09:28:57 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14V8p7-00047f-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:11:05 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.138] (helo=ruthenium) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14V8p6-00047a-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:11:04 +0000 Received: from [62.7.74.239] (helo=dave) by ruthenium with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14V8op-0002vy-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:10:47 +0000 Message-ID: <002401c09b1d$074fc8c0$ef4a073e@dave> From: "Dave Sergeant" To: "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: LF: Recent postings Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:10:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >From Dave G3YMC I have deliberately taken a back seat in recent days. It would be unfair of me to comment adversely on the recent transatlantic communications as I have not been part of them, but it must be agreed that they are a start. The achievements are not insignificant, and it is up to the individuals concerned as to whether they are to be classed as QSOs in the normal amateur sense of the word. It must be seen a basis to build on. The suggestion from Andre that now is perhaps the time to split off the high tech digital techniques on to another reflector is however timely and I have been thinking this for some while. I know I am not alone in having no interest in this aspect of lf, and like all aspects of amateur radio we all have different interests. However I am acutely aware that there are quite a few who have subscribed to the reflector but subsequently unsubscribed as they did not want their in boxes full of messages they had no interest in. I myself delete around 95% of reflector messages. The reflector in its original form was intended to promote interest in lf; it is the newcomers we want to keep, and if the content of the reflector is not to their liking they will not stay. As longer standing members divert to the more specialised modes it does seem logical that a seperate reflector be set up for their interest, although others would see it as devisive. I have nothing against the new digital modes (and in my professional capacity I am certainly not out of touch with technology) but it is not what I want to do in amateur radio. I took a short break from lf last week to work D68C in the Comoros on 12 hf band slots in three days (and they made 100k qsos in seven days...). Now that is amateur radio in my opinion! 73s Dave G3YMC dsergeant@btinternet.com dsergeant@iee.org http://www.btinternet.com/~dsergeant