Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19967 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2001 21:31:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2001 21:31:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 22074 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2001 21:31:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 14 Feb 2001 21:31:40 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14T9O8-0004K8-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:23:00 +0000 Received: from chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net ([195.40.1.44]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14T9O1-0004K0-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:22:53 +0000 Received: from ericadodd (tnt-13-43.easynet.co.uk [212.134.22.43]) by chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 79219F8842 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:22:34 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <002401c096cc$b1f82ba0$2b1686d4@ericadodd> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <004b01c096b7$97954e60$cf81d13e@f9.net.uk> Subject: LF: Re: T/A 2 and a half way. Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:25:01 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dave said: > Brilliant effort, just shows that a full 2-way can be done, indeed HAS been > but for a bit of 80mtrs which can only have made it more difficult! The idea of the remote receiver was not mine; it was John's. Originally he was to have made (again) the 150 mile journey to VE1ZZ with his receiving and computing kit. However other considerations, including the Canadian Winter, made this option difficult and I guess that is why he opted for the HF link. The idea was put to me by e-mail on Sunday evening. On Monday the weather was awful and in any case John was visiting friends. So we planned it, by e-mail, for the Tuesday and without any testing or practice went straight into the QSO as soon as VE1ZZ came through. The QSO required a certain degree of dexterity by the two Canadians. On the one hand at VE1ZJ; the receiving of my signal with Argo set up for what was an untested 10second dot period, then switching to 80m and the data transfer and acknowledgement, then back to 136 to monitor what was going on. Jack, VE1ZZ, had a different problem. He does not have a computer. He had rigged up an electro-mechanical device to send in beacon mode but sending data posed a difficulty. He overcame this by making a device with two relays and capacitors, one for dots and the other for dashes. He then used a stop watch to place these dots and dashes to key the transmitter, so VE1ZZ's transmission was semi hand keyed. At first I found the keying difficult to read, hence the 'M' report. But as the QSO progressed, Jack became more proficient at his keying and the signal strength improved. If you look at the pictures on Dave Pick's site I am sure you will be impressed at Jack's hand keying. For my part I had the easy bit. We had visitors and I was able to go and join them during my transmission periods - although I had difficulty explaining what I was up to. My view is that is a splendid effort by the Canadian 'team'. Regards, Peter, G3LDO